Prediction of Marty Riessen vs Anthony Hammond Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Riessen vs A. Hammond

Marty Riessen

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

251

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Anthony Hammond

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

251

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Riessen 1 - 0 Hammond

They have played 3 sets in total, with Marty Riessen winning 3 and Anthony Hammond winning 0. The last match between Marty Riessen and Anthony Hammond was at the Perth, 30-12-1968, Round: QF, Surface: Grass, with Marty Riessen getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Riessen	1
Hammond	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Perth(12-30-68)

Stats

Marty Riessen

Anthony Hammond

M. Riessen vs A. Hammond H2H Profile

M. Riessen	Stats	A. Hammond
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
62.59% (527-315)	Career Total W/L	34.62% (9-17)
1	Grass	0
14	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Riessen vs A. Hammond Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marty Riessen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Anthony Hammond has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marty Riessen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anthony Hammond has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Marty Riessen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anthony Hammond has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Marty Riessen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Anthony Hammond winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Marty Riessen has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 69% (W/L 18/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 148/96). Anthony Hammond has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 9/14), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Marty Riessen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Anthony Hammond has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marty Riessen winning 1 times and Anthony Hammond being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Marty Riessen winning 3 and Anthony Hammond winning 0.
The last match between Marty Riessen and Anthony Hammond was at the Perth, 30-12-1968, Round: QF, Surface: Grass, with Marty Riessen getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marty Riessen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Anthony Hammond has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marty Riessen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anthony Hammond has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Marty Riessen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anthony Hammond has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Marty Riessen vs Anthony Hammond Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Riessen vs A. Hammond H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Riessen	Stats	A. Hammond
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	0
18	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Riessen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 23-02-1981
R3 Gene MayerG. Mayer	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
La Quinta - 16-02-1981
R2 Robert LutzR. Lutz	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Philadelphia - 26-01-1981
R2 Victor AmayaV. Amaya	L	3-6 7-6 7-6	Stats
Monterrey WCT - 19-01-1981
R3 Phil DentP. Dent	W	7-6 6-7 6-3	Stats
R4 Wojtek FibakW. Fibak	L	DEF	Stats

View All

A. Hammond Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 26-12-1973
R2 William DurhamW. Durham	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Australian Open - 26-12-1971
R2 Neale FraserN. Fraser	L	6-3 6-3 6-4	Stats
Brisbane - 06-12-1971
R3 Allan McDonaldA. McDonald	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
R2 A MountfieldA. Mountfield	W	6-1 7-5	Stats
Manchester - 31-05-1971
R2 Antonio ZugarelliA. Zugarelli	W	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Riessen vs A. Hammond Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Riessen	Stats	A. Hammond
62.59% (527/315)	YTD Win/Loss	34.62% (9/17)
59.64% (1253/848)	Sets Win/Loss	36.76% (25/43)
100.00% (11271/0)	Games Win/Loss	46.30% (332/385)
60.66% (148/96)	Hard Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
66.49% (125/63)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
59.84% (152/102)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
64.62% (84/46)	Grass Win/Loss	39.13% (9/14)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
478.61	Average Opponent Rank	229.65
61.25% (49/31)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/5)
65.22% (15/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (1/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
62.65% (458/273)	Main Tour W/L	42.86% (9/12)
66.67% (4/2)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
63% (417/657)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	38% (6/16)
59% (86/146)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	30% (3/10)
80% (16/20)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
55% (138/251)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
86% (508/436)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (10/8)
14% (508/71)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (10/2)
24% (316/76)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	6% (16/1)